Milwaukee's Soft Bigotry By Charles J. Sykes
The results were
so encouraging, the paper suggested, that at the headquarters of the
Milwaukee Public Schools “you can almost hear the pop of champagne
bottles uncorking." The reason? "Most schools
showed gains. Of seven grades tested, reading scores climbed in five and
math scores in six. Overall, black students shared in the progress.” Amid the gaiety, the paper did note one “troubling
exception,” the shrinking number of high school sophomores who scored
proficient in math and reading. But this was not a time to cavil, it was a
time to break out the sparkling wine. How else to
celebrate this triumph of the soft bigotry of low expectations? Is that too
harsh? The
state test scores trumpeted by the state’s largest newspaper, showed
that 72 percent of the city’s 10th graders were not
proficient in math; and that 62% couldn’t read. If this was cause for
popping champagne corks, what exactly would failure look like? One
critic called the faux celebration “enabling failure.” In fact, it was
redefining “success,” or at least the expectations for the city’s
minority students. Wisconsin
had already taken dramatic strides toward that redefinition, by setting a
notoriously low standards for “proficiency.” Independent groups have
complained that Wisconsin educrats had dumbed down the standards far below
the more rigorous definition of proficiency in the National Assessment of
Educational Progress. But
the Journal Sentinel’s “champagne moment,” was bar-lowering with a
vengeance. As
the paper’s own news department reported the next day, the same test
results celebrated by the editorial showed that the racial achievement
gap for reading among Milwaukee’s 10th graders
had widened from 33 points to
35 points. In math, the racial gap ballooned from a grim 36 points three
years ago to a numbing 42 points this year. Specifically:
according to the state’s Department of Public Instruction, only 31
percent of black sophomores can read (down six points in two years); only
18 percent of black sophomores can do math (down two points.) Noted
one insider: “How much lower could they go? We’re almost reaching dead
cat bounce range with some of these scores.” In
a suburban district or in an urban area with an aroused citizenry and
vigilant media, these results might have sparked outrage and indignant
calls for dramatic action. In Milwaukee, they are brushed aside in the
champagne toasts of the triumph of mediocrity and indifference that
increasingly characterize the city’s civic life. After
all, it’s not as if one of the editorial writers’ own
children brought home the dismal report card. This
is the failure of other people’s
children. Other
people who were not invited to share the bubbly. [1] Panglossian: “A
person who is optimistic regardless of the circumstances,” named
after Voltaire’s character, Dr. Pangloss, the tutor and philosopher
in Candide, who insisted that “All is for the best in the
best of all possible worlds.” He would have fit comfortably into any
modern educational bureaucracy. |
||||||
©2007 Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Inc. P.O. Box 487 Thiensville, WI 53092 |
||||||